.png)
Virtual tours have become an essential part of real estate marketing. As remote browsing and online engagement grow, real estate agents and teams need tools that not only create compelling property tours but also support collaboration, scalability, and long-term marketing goals.
In the world of immersive property visualization, CloudPano vs Matterport comparison is among the most talked-about topics. Both platforms are widely used, yet they offer different strengths that appeal to different audiences — especially real estate teams.
This guide breaks down the key differences between CloudPano and Matterport, explores why teams of all sizes are seeking Matterport alternatives for real estate, and helps you answer one central question: Which virtual tour platform works best for your team’s growth and workflow?
In October 2025, a major industry shift got the attention of real estate professionals. Zillow announced that it had removed Matterport 3D virtual tours from Zillow and StreetEasy listings, citing changes in API agreements and restrictions related to tour content integrations. Zillow claimed this was due to limitations placed by CoStar — the parent company of Matterport — that restricted virtual tour content display on third-party platforms. (inman.com)
CoStar, however, responded by saying that Matterport customers can still share their tours broadly — including on Zillow — and that Zillow’s interpretation was not accurate. (housingwire.com)
What this meant for teams and agents was clear: your virtual tour platform’s integrations and hosting strategy can directly affect where your content appears — and how buyers discover it.
Because of these changes, many real estate teams began reevaluating their choices in best virtual tour software for real estate, both for immediate use and long-term sustainability.
For individual agents, a standalone tool might suffice for occasional listing tours. But for teams — whether small brokerages or enterprise firms — a virtual tour solution must:
✔ Support multiple users and accounts
✔ Offer collaboration features
✔ Provide centralized tour libraries
✔ Enable scalable content hosting
✔ Integrate well with real estate CRMs and websites
✔ Provide flexible branding and lead capture
In short, real estate teams need something beyond a simple tour viewer — they need real estate 3D tour platform comparison insights that lead to scalable, flexible, and professional solutions.
Let’s take a high-level view of each platform before we dive deeper into comparisons.
CloudPano is known for its flexible, cloud-based tour hosting and customization features. It allows users to upload panoramic and 360° media captured from a variety of devices — not just proprietary hardware — and then publish tours with custom branding, embed options, and lead capture tools.
CloudPano’s versatility makes it especially attractive for teams that want:
It’s often mentioned in reviews of Matterport alternatives for real estate because it caters well to marketing-focused teams. (cloudpano.com)
Matterport is widely recognized for its immersive 3D digital twins, automated scanning workflows, and polished presentation layer. Its strengths lie in:
Matterport’s platform is a longtime favorite for its high-quality visuals, especially in luxury markets or architectural showcases.
But as the Zillow incident highlighted, platform dependencies can be a double-edged sword. While Matterport offers a premium experience, its reliance on third-party integrations — and the potential for those integrations to change — is a consideration for teams that depend on wide visibility.
CloudPano:
Designed for flexibility and easy adoption. Teams can upload media from a wide range of cameras, including popular 360° devices. The workflow is straightforward, and non-technical users can quickly create and publish tours.
Matterport:
Matterport often involves a more structured capture process, typically with dedicated scanners or compatible devices. While polished, it may come with a steeper learning curve for new users — especially when capturing complex spaces.
Team Tip: For teams with photographers or agents of varying technical skill levels, a simpler upload and publish workflow can increase adoption and speed up production.
CloudPano:
Offers extensive branding options, allowing teams to white-label tours with logos, custom colors, and personalized navigation. This is a big advantage when you want your tours to reinforce your brokerage brand, not the platform’s.
Matterport:
While Matterport delivers high-quality tours, branding options are more limited. The platform focuses more on presentation consistency than customization.
Team Tip: For teams prioritizing marketing and brand consistency across all tours, CloudPano often offers more control.
CloudPano:
CloudPano’s embed codes are simple and versatile, allowing teams to place tours on any website, landing page, or listing portal that supports iframes. This flexibility helps teams maintain consistent tour placement across their digital ecosystem.
Matterport:
Matterport embeds are also supported, but the experience is closely tied to Matterport’s viewer architecture. While still functional, changes in integrations (like with Zillow) remind teams that hosting and visibility can be affected by external partners.
Team Tip: Platforms that offer flexible embeds help ensure tours remain visible even if external integrations shift.
CloudPano for Real Estate Teams
CloudPano’s structure supports:
✔ Multiple user accounts
✔ Centralized tour libraries
✔ Team permissions and roles
✔ Consistent templates
This makes it easier for brokerages with multiple agents to standardize tours and workflows without redundancy.
Matterport
Love its immersive detailing, but Matterport’s workspace and project management features may feel more individual-centric than team-centric in larger, multi-user environments.
Team Tip: If your brokerage plans to grow or support multiple users, a platform designed with team workflows in mind may reduce administrative bottlenecks.
Cost is always a key consideration in a CloudPano vs Matterport comparison — especially when scaling across a team.
Matterport Hosting Costs:
Matterport typically requires subscription plans that scale based on the number of hosted tours and features. For teams with many listings, this can add up over time.
CloudPano Virtual Tour Storage:
CloudPano’s pricing tends to be more flexible and budget-friendly, especially when managing large volumes of tours or hosting across multiple team users. Some teams find the cost structure easier to plan for long-term hosting needs.
Team Tip: Compare long-term hosting costs alongside features — the cheapest platform initially may not be the most affordable at scale.
The Zillow–Matterport situation wasn’t just a technical dispute — it served as a real-world example of how dependence on external platform integrations can impact visibility. Real estate teams that depended heavily on Matterport tours being shown across Zillow listings suddenly faced a change in exposure due to policy shifts outside their control.
This highlighted a broader lesson: Your virtual tour strategy must consider delivery methods beyond single-vendor dependencies.
For teams evaluating platforms, this has encouraged emphasis on:
Platforms that support flexible delivery help teams maintain visibility even when portal behavior shifts — an essential part of long-term planning.
Teams use virtual tours to elevate listing presentations and provide immersive walkthroughs that differentiate their properties.
Tours embedded on team or agent websites help improve engagement and boost SEO signals like time on page and interaction depth.
Sharing tours on social media and in email campaigns increases reach and positions your listings as modern and easy to explore.
Interactive tours give buyers a sense of ownership and familiarity before in-person visits, often speeding up decision-making.
A versatile platform becomes a central part of a team’s marketing ecosystem — not just a standalone tool.
Here’s a simple way to approach your decision:
By focusing on these priorities, teams can choose a solution that serves them both today and well into the future.
The CloudPano vs Matterport comparison isn’t about declaring a winner — it’s about understanding your team’s needs and how a platform fits into your growth strategy. Matterport delivers industry-leading immersive tours, while CloudPano shines with flexibility, embedding, and team-friendly workflows.
For many growing brokerages and real estate teams, business-friendly virtual tour platforms that balance quality, flexibility, and scalability offer the best path forward.
Whether you prioritize immersive 3D experiences or flexible branding and hosting, the right platform empowers your team to deliver standout listings and build a consistent, future-ready marketing strategy. 🚀
Compact, ready to go anywhere
Interchangeable lens that’s upgradeable
Dual 1-inch sensors for improved clarity and low light performance
Dynamic range and 6K 360° capture
360° photo resolution at 21MP
8K 360° video recording for ultra-detailed visuals.
4K single-lens mode for traditional wide-angle shots.
Invisible selfie stick effect for drone-like perspectives.
2.5-inch touchscreen with Gorilla Glass protection.
Waterproof up to 33ft for underwater shooting.
360° photo resolution in 23MP
Slim design at 24 mm thick
Built-in image stabilization for smooth video capture.
Internal 19GB storage for photo and video storage.
Wireless connectivity for remote control and sharing.
60MP 360° still images for high-resolution photography.
5.7K 360° video recording at 30fps.
2.25-inch touchscreen for intuitive control.
USB Type-C port for fast charging and data transfer.
MicroSD card slot for expandable storage.
.png)
.png)
Try it free. No credit card required. Instant set-up.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}